Abstract
In dissimilar welds between martensitic stainless steel F6NM and nitrogen-strengthened austenitic stainless steel FXM-19, type 209 austenitic welding consumables are used to align with the mechanical properties and chemical composition of FXM-19, with F6NM welds requiring post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) to restore ductility and toughness, raising concerns about sigma embrittlement in ER209 butter welds. This study investigated the mechanical properties and microstructure of F6NM+FXM-19 dissimilar welds, finding no detrimental sigma phase formation in the butter (PWHT) and groove weld metal (as welded) across various welding processes, indicating no sigma phase transformation due to PWHT. Submerged arc welding (SAW) and gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) demonstrated good mechanical properties, while Gas Metal Arc Welding with 100% Ar gas shield (GMAW 100% Ar) could not be properly evaluated due to weld defects. SAW and GTAW were deemed suitable for this dissimilar weld joint, with several welding processes providing acceptable results using ER209 filler material for fabricating pressure vessels requiring F6NM to XM-19 joints.
