Abstract
To stay competitive in today’s dynamic energy market, traditional thermal power plants must enhance efficiency, operate flexibly, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This creates challenges for material industries to provide solutions for harsh operating conditions and fluctuating loads. Higher efficiency demands steels with excellent steam oxidation resistance, favoring ferritic steels for cycling operation due to their limited thermal expansion. This paper presents a study modeling a combined cycle power plant using GE 9HA0.2 GT technology. The analysis compares different maximum live steam temperatures (585°C, 605°C, 620°C) and four alloys (grades 91 and 92, stainless S304H, and Thor 115) for heat exchangers exposed to steam oxidation. Results indicate that Thor 115, a creep strength enhanced ferritic (CSEF) steel, is a viable alternative to stainless steel for live steam temperatures above 600°C, offering improved oxidation resistance with minimal weight increase. Modern CSEF steels outperform stainless steel in power plants with lower capacity factors, reducing thermal fatigue during load changes. Increasing the live steam temperature boosts plant efficiency, leading to significant CO2 savings for the same power output.