Abstract
The global electric power production is largely dependent on the operation of fossil-fired generation units. Many coal-fired units are exceeding 300,000 hours, which is beyond the expected design life. This has caused a continuous need to inspect steam touched components operating at high temperature and pressure. State-of-the-art coal and combined cycle gas units are specifying ever-greater amounts of the Creep Strength Enhanced Ferritic (CSEF) steels such as Grade 91 or Grade 92. The martensitic 9%Cr CSEF steels were developed to provide greater strength than traditional low alloy power plant steels, such as Grades 11, 12 and 22. The enhanced strength allows for a reduction in overall wall thickness in new or replacement components. Extensive research in both service failures and laboratory testing has shown that time-dependent creep damage can develop differently in Grade 91 steel when compared to low alloy steels. Furthermore, the creep strength in Grade 91 can vary by more than a factor of 10 between different heats. This wide variation of creep strength has led to extensive research in understanding the damage mechanisms and progression of damage in this steel. In this study, large cross weld samples were fabricated from thick wall piping in Grade 91 steel using two different heats of material. One weld was fabricated in a ‘damage tolerant’ heat and another weld was fabricated in a ‘damage intolerant’ heat of material. The samples were subjected to a post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) at a temperature of 745°C (1375°F) for 1.50 hours. Hardness maps were collected on the cross-welds in the as-welded and PWHT condition for both weldments. Cross-weld creep test conditions were selected to develop accelerated damage representative of in-service behavior. The test samples were interrupted at multiple stages and nondestructively evaluated (NDE) with advanced phased-array ultrasonic techniques. Samples were developed to variable levels of damage (50% to 100% life fraction) in both weldments. Metallographic sections were extracted at specific locations to validate the NDE findings using light emitting diode, laser and scanning electron microscopy. This research is being used to help validate the level of damage that can be reliably detected using conventional and advanced NDE techniques.